As Rev. Jennifer Ryu spoke this morning about the value of being a multicultural church (btw, we are described as being a mono-cultural church, despite our oft-stated desires to be otherwise), I couldn’t help but wonder: What is the physical appearance of a multicultural church? Should we be thinking about this as we move forward with our master plan?
I spoke with Rev. Ryu after the service and she said she thought the appearance of our church actually was fairly multicultural and welcoming, with it’s hexagonal shape and banners from multiple spiritual traditions (Oh good, I thought to myself). She comes from Virginia, where she describes her church as being fairly traditional looking with a ‘New Englandy’ appearance, and I assume traditional pews and pulpit. (Well, we don’t have that problem, I thought).
She also talked about how when she lived in Baltimore she would regularly walk by the Unitarian Church there and notice all the unusual quotations (from noteworthy Unitarian Universalists) they had posted outside. They drew her in.
So I’m thinking maybe we should give some thought to modernizing our physical appearance. We do look a bit ‘dated’, a bit ‘60’ish’ (Come on, you know it’s true…). It’s our home and kind of like comfortable old shoes to us, but if we’re going to the trouble of modernizing and bringing things up to code (in addition to optimizing functional spaces), shouldn’t we be thinking about our public image? What about more thought-provoking signage at the street? Or an engaging piece of sculpture? Or ???
While it’s true that most of us would stay here regardless of our ‘window dressings’, in the interest of long-term vitality and sustainability maybe this is a good time to be thinking about the ‘face’ that we present to the world.
What do you think?
- Barbara Gardner
